Motorola Moto M (3GB RAM, 32GB)Oppo F1s (4GB RAM, 64GB)
Motorola Moto M (3GB RAM, 32GB)
remove phone
Oppo F1s (4GB RAM, 64GB)
remove phone
magic score68.062.4
PriceRs. 15,999 onwardsRs. 18,635 onwards
Buy Now buy now buy now
Launch Date (India)Dec, 2016Nov, 2016
Smartphone OSAndroid 6.0, Expected upgrade to 7.0Android 5.1
Screen Resolution1080x1920 pixels (~ 401 pixels per inch)720x1280 pixels (~ 267 pixels per inch)
Display FeaturesIPS LCD, Scratch Resistant (Corning Gorilla Glass)IPS TFT, 2.5D Curved Glass Display, Scratch Resistant (Corning Gorilla Glass 4), Gloved And Wet Touch Input Support
Processor2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Processor NameMediatek MT6755 Helio P15MediaTek MT6750
RAM3 GB4 GB
Camera16.0 MP13.0 MP
Secondary Camera8.0 MP16.0 MP
Internal Memory32 GB64 GB
Dual SIMGSM+GSM (Hybrid SIM slot)GSM+GSM
Thickness7.85 mm7.38 mm
Weight163 gm160 gm
Battery Capacity3050 mAh3075 mAh
Editor's Note [Positives]
  • Good looking design, premium look and feel
  • Decent display - high contrast and decent sunlight legibility
  • Almost stock Android build keeps things nice and simple
  • Good performance in daily use - though underpowered in the graphics department
  • Good loudspeaker
  • Clean audio output
  • Good front-facing 8MP cam - produces great selfies - detailed, and with pleasing skin tones
  • Excellent, top-notch build quality
  • Handsome, classy, all-metal design
  • Slim body
  • Basic back cover included in the retail package
  • Excellent, fast fingerprint scanner, embedded in the home button
  • Very good display with exceptional brightness levels, natural looking tones, good contrast levels, and excellent viewing angles
  • ColorOS is fluid, and works well, with some nice gesture controls
  • Very little bloatware
  • Smooth overall performance - muti-tasking performance is even better than the other Oppo F1s variant, with an additional GB of RAM
  • Decent overall rear camera, especially for still photography
  • Very good front camera - easily one of the best selfie phones in this price bracket
  • Decent battery life - lasts a full day with moderate use
  • Good loudspeaker
Editor's Note [Negatives]
  • Average rear camera - color reproduction, dynamic range and exposure could have been better
  • 1080p video recording from either camera is also uninspiring
  • Average battery life
  • A little bit on the heavy side
  • Display resolution could have been better
  • Misses out on fast charging support
  • 1080p video recording quality is subpar
Expert Reviews
User Reviews
Official WebsiteOfficial Website »Official Website »
Video Comparisons
Looking for TVs/Tablets/Headphones recommendations? Check out our new research tool - gadgetmonkey.io