Compare: Nokia 6.1 Plus (4GB RAM) vs Nokia 6.2

Our Opinion

The Nokia 6.2 is a slightly better phone than the Nokia 6.1 Plus (4GB RAM), and is also significantly better value for money. What should you buy? Go for the Nokia 6.2!

Features
Videos

only differences

all features

	Nokia 6.1 Plus (4GB RAM)	Nokia 6.2

Buy Now	not available currently	Buy
Excellence Score	19.8	21.9
Value for Money Score	46.7	53.3
Price	₹ 15,999 onwards	₹ 13,694 onwards
Launch Date (India)	Aug, 2018	Oct, 2019
Expected Launch Date	N/A	N/A
Smartphone OS	Android 8.1 Oreo, Upgradeable to Android 10Low likelihood of getting updated to next Android versionAndroid One series	Android 9.0 Pie, Upgradeable to Android 10Expected update to next Android versionAndroid One series
Touchscreen	Yes (Capacitive)	Yes (Capacitive)
Screen Size	5.8 inches	6.3 inches
Screen Resolution	1080x2280 pixels (~ 435 pixels per inch)	1080x2280 pixels (~ 400 pixels per inch)
Tall Aspect Ratio / Minimal Bezels	Yes	Yes
Scratch Resistant Display	Yes, Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Yes, Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Display Type	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
Screen Refresh Rate	60 HzStandard	60 HzStandard
Display Features	IPS LCD, FullView Display	HDR10, Always-on Display
Full Physical QWERTY Keypad
Processor	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
Processor Type	Octa Core	Octa Core
Processor Name	Qualcomm Snapdragon 636Ranked #64 in Mobile Processor Benchmarks	Qualcomm Snapdragon 636Ranked #64 in Mobile Processor Benchmarks
GPU	Adreno 509	Adreno 509
RAM	4 GB	4 GB
3G	Yes	Yes
4G	Yes	Yes
5G
VoLTE	Yes	Yes
WiFi	Yes	Yes
VoWiFi/WiFi-Calling	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
Connecting Port	USB-C	USB-C
Primary Camera	16MP + 5MP	16MP + 8MP + 5MP
Camera Auto-Focus	Yes	Yes
Camera Flash	Yes	Yes
HD Video Recording	Yes (Full HD)	Yes (4K)
Other Camera Features	16MP: F/2.0 Aperture; 1.0um Pixel Size, 5MP: F/2.2 Aperture; 1.2um Pixel Size, Phase Detection Autofocus, Gyro-EIS, Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Face detection, Panorama, HDR	16MP: F/1.8 Aperture; 27mm Focal length; 1.0um Pixel Size; PDAF, 8MP: F/2.2 Aperture; 13mm Focal Length; Ultrawide lens, 5MP: Depth Sensor, Panorama, HDR, Video: [email protected]; [email protected]
Secondary Camera	16.0MP	8MP
Secondary Camera Features	F/2.0 Aperture, 1.0um Pixel Size	F/2.0 Aperture, 1/4" Sensor Size, 1.12um Pixel Size, HDR
Internal Memory	64 GB	64 GB
Expandable Memory Slot	Yes, up to 400 GB	Yes, up to 512 GB
Contacts Storage	Unlimited	Unlimited
SMS Storage	Unlimited	Unlimited
Music Player	Yes	Yes
FM Radio		Yes
Dual SIM	GSM+GSM (Hybrid SIM slot)	GSM+GSM (Hybrid SIM slot)
Thickness	8 mmMedium	8.3 mmMedium
Weight	151 gmMedium	180 gmMedium
Width	71.0 mmComfortable for one-handed use	75.1 mmOk for one-handed use
Audio Output	3.5mm jack	3.5mm jack
Water Resistant
Battery Capacity	3060 mAh	3500 mAh
Battery Standby	348 hrs	N/A
Battery Standby (3G)	N/A	N/A
Battery Talktime	N/A	N/A
Battery Talktime (3G)	N/A	N/A
Fast Charging Support	Yes, 18W Quick Charge 3.0
Included Fast Charger	Yes
Other Battery Parameters	Talk time: Upto 20.5 hrs, Music Playback time: Upto: 9.5 hrs, Video Playback time: Upto 9 hrs	N/A
Fingerprint sensor	Yes	Yes
Other Features	Noise Filtration	Noise Filtration
2-minute Review [Positives]	Premium glass sandwich design housed within a sturdy aluminum frame - the stainless steel accents around the camera and the buttons, further add to the the aesthetics Compact form-factor - one of the rare mid-range devices today that's built for one-handed use Fast fingerprint scanner Nice, tall, 'notch' based display - bright and vibrant - with useful add-ons like 'night light' and 'ambient display' Stock Android UI keeps things nice and simple and being part of the Android One series, you are ensured regular Android updates for a good 2 years A very capable mid-range chipset, the Snapdragon 636, ensures performance that is on par with the other top phone in this price bracket, the Redmi Note 5 Pro - almost anything you throw at the phone is handled well Decent set of dual cameras on the rear, that can produce reasonably good pictures in good light, and also take decent bokeh shots Decent front camera too - it takes decently well-detailed selfies that are sharp and saturated Quick charging support On the whole, the Nokia 6.1 is a good alternative to the Redmi Note 5 Pro in the mid range (the Redmi Note 5 Pro has the better camera, and better battery life, but Nokia 6.1 wins with stock Android, and is more compact) and gives you both some serious style and substance on a budget	Excellent design and looks, dual Gorilla Glass 3 Very good, bright, large IPS display Being an Android One phone, you get the simple, clean, stock Android experience + timely future Android updates Can take some great portraits
2-minute Review [Negatives]	Although glass designs always tend to be more premium, they also tend to be slippery, fingerprint magnets, and less durable (so you might want to use a case) Both the rear and front cameras are not very good in sub-optimal lighting conditions - and even overall, not up to the high standards of the Redmi Note 5 Pro, or the Mi A2 The camera app on the Nokia 6.1 Plus is somewhat cluttered too Battery life is ok, but definitely could have been better given the competition - it will last you the day with moderate use, but with heavy use you will need to recharge it by late evening	Lacklustre performance based on the old Snapdragon 636 chipset - while day-to-day performance is ok, within this price range, Nokia 6.2 is a big laggard Overall though, the triple rear camera setup (16MP primary + 8MP ultra-wide + 5MP depth) is average in terms of image quality - the white balance, the noise level, the color reproduction, and the dynamic range - all could have been better Mediocre 1080p videos Mediocre selfie camera The cameras are also a bit on the slow side Average battery life, with a 3500mAh battery - you will get a day of use with moderate usage - a lot of competitors are much better in this regard No quick charging support - it goes from 0 to 100% in about 2 hours Overall, the Nokia 6.2 is just an average product in this price bracket, and struggles to stand out due to its lacklustre performance and cameras - even if you are keen on a stock Android experience, you will find better alternatives around
Expert Reviews	A very compelling device and one that deserves consideration in-depth Read Review » A complete budget device, with a premium design and top-notch performance in-depth Read Review » Addresses most of the shortcomings of the Nokia 6.1, which was launched earlier on in the year in-depth Read Review » A damn fine smartphone in-depth Read Review » Offers mid-range specs in a premium design...a good alternative to the Redmi Note 5 Pro in-depth Read Review » Is not only well-priced but also competitive against its key competition in-depth Read Review » For those discerning individuals who want an unfussy smartphone experience in an attractive chassis in-depth Read Review » Mid-Range Phone That’s Good Value for Money in-depth Read Review » It's got almost everything you could ask for in an affordable mid-range smartphone in-depth Read Review » If it's style and substance on a budget that you seek, it's the the Nokia 6.1 Plus that you want in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » in-depth Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review »	We just can't recommend this Android One-powered smartphone in-depth Read Review » Falters a bit on the selfie camera and the general system performance, but the Nokia 6.2 is a respectable smartphone for those who value a massive screen and stylish design in-depth Read Review » Won't wow you, but it'll get the job done in-depth Read Review » A solid, if uninspired, budget phone that gets the job done in-depth Read Review » A good choice for price-conscious Android purists in-depth Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review » hands-on Read Review »
User Reviews	4.3 26,494+ reviews » 0.0 411+ reviews »	4.1 29+ reviews » 3.7 276+ reviews »
Official Website	Official Website »	Official Website »
Unofficial specs?	N/A	N/A